Book History's Best Books

Leslie Howsam, President of SHARP and University Professor, University of Windsor, Canada, writes:

What have been the most innovative monographs in the field of book history published in the past 20 years, since the foundation of SHARP in 1991?  The question arose a couple of months ago when I read, on Twitter, the feedback and controversy generated by History Today. Their editors celebrated the popular history magazine’s 30th anniversary by surveying readers and interviewing prominent historians about ‘the most important historian’ and ‘favourite works of history’ over the past 60 years.

SHARP had an anniversary of its own in 2011, and our society has even generated a list of potential ‘best books’, the record of winners of the SHARP De Long Book History Book Prize. But recent SHARP blog posts by Amadio Arboleda and Claire Squires show us that those awards were arrived at with difficulty, and some deserving works are bound to have been overlooked. Others will have emerged into prominence too late for the cycle of prize giving.

To start what I hope will be a vigorous discussion in the comments section below, I’ll put forward a book we discussed last semester in my own graduate class on the history of the book. I am a huge admirer of Isabel Hofmeyr’s The Portable Bunyan: A Transnational History of The Pilgrim’s Progress (published in 2004 by Princeton University Press). It tells the story of the transnational circulation of John Bunyan’s 17th-century work, regarded by many as quintessentially English, but redefined in Hofmeyr’s hands as ineluctably African. She stresses translation, translatability and circulation, and her approach to some 80 translations is ‘guided by a method of keeping one’s eye on the book as a material object’.

That’s my vote for one of the most innovative monographs of the past two decades. What’s yours?


Comments
Lise Jaillant
- 2012-01-03 at 18:52

I would vote for Catherine Turner's "Marketing Modernism between the Two World Wars" (published in 2003 in the excellent "studies in print culture series" of the U of Massachusetts P). Turner shows the ways in which Knopf, Random House and other publishers sold modernist texts to a wide audience in the first half of the 20th century.
paul dijstelber
- 2012-01-03 at 19:54

The book I liked best was written by Diane E. Booton. Manuscripts, Market and the Transition to Print in Late Medieval Brittany. Ashgate 2010. This seems an abstruse subject but the combination of very good scholarship, original research that resulted in a very well written text, makes this an important book that should be read by any bookhistorian who takes his work seriously - even if you are hardly interested in early modern times or do not like the French that much. The methodology is exemplary. The importance of archival research shows on every page.

Apart from this: McKitterick, Darnton and Tanselle - but every one knows them and their value.
Christopher H .
- 2012-01-03 at 21:27

I'd nominate Andrew Pettegree's The Book in the Renaissance (Yale UP, 2010) as a literate, readable, well-documented survey that takes an exemplary interest in the book as a factor in economic as well as cultural history.
Amanda L
- 2012-01-03 at 23:06

Jonathan Rose's The Intellectual Life of the British Working Classes (2001) has been the most influential book history work for me. The emphasis on the reader's reading experiences created a fascinating social (and political) history.
Amadio Arboleda
- 2012-01-04 at 09:45

As usual, I ask the question, "most innovative where?" In the West? In Europe? In the US? In English? So, I vote for what I have read in Japanese about Japan (a great reading nation). It is Nagamine Shigetoshi’s “Dokusho kokumin no tanjou – Meiji 30 nendai no katsuji medeia to dokusho bunka” (Birth of a reading public: Movable type media and reading culture in the late Meiji Period), published in 2004 by the Nihon Editaa Sukuuru Shuppan Bu (Japan Editor’s School Publishing Department). It's a masterful account of how the availability of reading material expanded faster with the introduction of western movable type and was brought to larger numbers of readers through other modern developments, such as railroads for improved transportation and public and lending libraries for greater access. The author demonstrates how this took place in parallel with increased education, industrialization and expanding incomes.

Greg Barnhisel
- 2012-01-04 at 16:18

For those of us working in 20th century book history, it's hard to underestimate the importance of Lawrence Rainey's work--particularly INSTITUTIONS OF MODERNISM. He really set the terms of debate for how we talk about the material book in 20th century literary culture--highbrow versus lowbrow, market economies versus economies of patronage, etc. Not everyone agrees with all of Rainey's conclusions or theoretical models, but the best subsequent work in the field--including Cathy Turner's wonderful book, Lise's praise for which I echo--has found it necessary to engage with Rainey.
Nicholas Morris
- 2012-01-04 at 16:42

The "innovation" component of Leslie's post seems particularly interesting, as influence/importance and innovation are somewhat different. Some of the most recent innovative scholarship in book history has remained within the scholarly journal realm and not made it to monograph (unsurprisingly, perhaps). Takes, for example, Randall McLeod's work, Peter Stallybrass's essay "'Little Jobs': Broadsides and the Printing Revolution" in the collection _Agent of Change_(2007), or Stallybrass, Roger Chartier, John Mowery and Heather Wolfe's piece "Hamlet's Table and the Technologies of Writing in Renaissance England" in _Shakespeare Quarterly_(2004). My nomination would be a book too recent to determine its influence, but innovatively surely seems to qualify: Bonnie Mak's "How the Page Matters" (2011). Mak manages to trace a compelling history of the _Controversia de nobilitate_, say something new and importance about mise en page, and make it all relevant to the History of the Book/Present of the Book/Future of the Book and Digital Humanities conversation.
Shaf Towheed
- 2012-01-11 at 16:18

This is a very important question, and thank you Leslie for posing it. I think it's also worth considering the legacy of various scholarly monographs in the history of the book over the last 5o years, as 'Book History' has taken shape as a discipline. This is very much an ongoing debate - some of the most innovative works have come from outside literature or history, while other consciously book historical works have had unexpected intellectual legacies. Readers might be interested in a seminar series titled 'Landmarks in Book History: the Future of the Discipline' which starts today - details can be found here: http://events.sas.ac.uk/events/visitor_events.php?page=ies_seminars&func=results&aoi_id=316 I'm sure the discussions in the seminar series will also feed in/from the discussion here on SHARP Blog.
Leave a Comment
Captcha
| More

SHARP tweets:

Moderator Login Form