Conference Policies

Peer Review Process

The Selection Committee will judge submissions by the following criteria:

1. overall scientific relevance (novelty, originality, timeliness, scope,...)
2. relevance to the conference topic (as defined in the call for papers) 
3. feasibility (are the questions generally answerable? is the proposed method/approach convincing?)  
4. coherence (is the proposal logically organized and clearly written?)
5. scientic quality (effectiveness and appropriateness of theoretical framework, sources, research method,...)

 

Archive Access Policy

The presentations that make up the current and archived conferences on this site have been made open access and are freely available for viewing, for the benefit of authors and interested readers.